The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the controversial Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) has uncovered alleged forgery, alteration and fabrication of presidential and legislative documents reportedly used to give the purported organisation the appearance of a legitimate federal agency.
The committee also disclosed that about 58 bank accounts had been identified as allegedly linked to Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, who was presented as the Director-General of the purported council, while an alleged ₦400 million transaction involving him is also under investigation.
However, the committee exonerated the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, from allegations that he authorised, established or participated in the activities of the purported organisation.
The committee, chaired by Rep. Yusuf Adamu Gagdi, said its preliminary findings showed that the organisation was not lawfully created by the Federal Government and that documents allegedly used to give it presidential and legislative legitimacy were forged, fabricated or altered.
Fake presidential appointment letter
The lawmakers found that a purported letter appointing Adeyemi as Director-General of the PFIPC and allegedly bearing Gbajabiamila’s authority and signature was not issued by the Chief of Staff or the Presidency.
According to the committee, evidence obtained from the State House established that “no such appointment was made or approved by the Presidency” and that “the Chief of Staff neither issued nor signed the letter.”
The committee also found that the letterhead used was not authentic State House letterhead, while the reference number on the document was inconsistent with the Presidency’s official referencing system.
“The format, language and administrative features of the document departed materially from official State House correspondence,” the committee stated.
It consequently made a preliminary finding that “the purported appointment letter was fabricated and falsely attributed to the Presidency.”
Gbajabiamila cleared of involvement
Rather than finding evidence linking Gbajabiamila to the alleged scheme, the committee said documents before it showed that the Chief of Staff took steps to trigger investigations after concerns about the purported organisation were brought to his attention.
The committee said that following an alert from the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission (NIPC) over suspected fraudulent activities and misuse of institutional materials, Gbajabiamila acted within one day by communicating with the Nigeria Police Force, Office of the National Security Adviser, Department of State Services (DSS) and Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
It said he also initiated administrative verification through relevant government institutions.
The committee added that when further concerns emerged over a proposed World Investment Summit, Gbajabiamila issued additional communications requesting investigation and appropriate action.
In one of its strongest findings, the committee stated: “The documentary evidence presently before the Committee does not establish that the Chief of Staff authorised, approved, established or participated in the activities of the purported organisation.”
It added: “On the contrary, the evidence demonstrates repeated steps to secure investigation, institutional verification and appropriate administrative action.”
The committee consequently commended Gbajabiamila for what it described as timely security and administrative interventions whenever the matter was formally brought to his attention.
Fake Executive Order uncovered
The committee also said it uncovered a purported Presidential Executive Order No. 5 dated February 24, 2026, which was allegedly used to provide legal authority for the purported organisation.
The lawmakers said evidence before them indicated that the document was neither issued nor approved through the lawful processes of the Presidency.
“The evidence presently available indicates that the document was not an authentic Executive Order of the President and was neither issued nor approved through the lawful processes of the Presidency,” the committee said.
The committee described the alleged fabrication of a presidential instrument as a serious matter capable of undermining the authority and integrity of the Nigerian state.
Purported National Assembly Act allegedly altered
The panel also uncovered what it described as the alleged mutilation and fabrication of a document presented as an Act of the National Assembly establishing the purported agency.
According to the lawmakers, the document was never passed by both chambers of the National Assembly, assented to by the President or gazetted as an Act of the Federation.
The committee further said portions of a document relating to another institution appeared to have been electronically altered, mutilated or substituted to create the impression that Parliament had established the purported organisation.
“The Committee considers this aspect of the investigation particularly grave,” the report stated.
It added that “no individual, organisation or group has the lawful authority to manufacture legislative authority by editing, mutilating, substituting or fabricating a document and presenting it as an enactment of Parliament.”
Fake State House letter allegedly used to obtain government code
The investigation also uncovered a letter dated November 7, 2024, purportedly issued by the State House and addressed to the Accountant-General of the Federation, requesting an administrative code for the PFIPC.
The letter was allegedly signed by one Akambi Adewale, described in the document as a Director of Administration and Support Services.
However, the committee said the State House established that the office represented in the document did not exist in the stated form, the purported directorate did not exist as represented, and no State House officer known as Akambi Adewale served in the claimed capacity.
“The Committee therefore preliminarily finds that fictitious names, offices and official designations were deployed in a document calculated to mislead an important financial institution of the Federal Government,” the report stated.
Accountant-General and Budget Office questioned
The committee said the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation confirmed that its response to the purported State House request was authentic, although the originating request was allegedly forged.
The office also acknowledged that its response should not have been released to Adeyemi or another unauthorised person and ought instead to have been transmitted through a properly authenticated official channel.
The committee said it was investigating whether the incident resulted from negligence, failure to observe verification requirements, breach of correspondence procedures, wilful disregard of due process or deliberate facilitation.
The Budget Office of the Federation is also under scrutiny over how the purported organisation gained recognition within the Federal Budget Framework despite allegedly lacking lawful status.
Fake agency occupied Federal Secretariat office
The panel further found that the purported organisation occupied office accommodation within the Federal Secretariat Complex without lawful allocation from the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.
Evidence before the committee indicated that part of the accommodation earlier allocated to the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation was subsequently made available to the purported organisation by certain officers without lawful authority.
The lawmakers said occupying the facility helped the organisation project itself as a legitimate federal institution.
39 people allegedly recruited
The committee disclosed that approximately 39 people were allegedly presented as employees of the purported organisation.
It said it was investigating their recruitment, appointment letters, identity cards, salaries and allowances.
The panel is also looking into allegations that some individuals may have been required to pay money as a condition for employment.
The committee stressed that it would distinguish between people who were allegedly deceived and those who knowingly participated in or benefited from the activities under investigation.
58 bank accounts allegedly linked to network
Another major discovery involved a network of bank accounts allegedly linked to Adeyemi, who also appeared in some records as Adeyemi Matthew.
The committee said preliminary financial information indicated that identifying details associated with Adeyemi were linked to approximately 58 bank accounts.
More than 30 of the accounts were apparently operated in the names of various agencies, companies, foundations or related entities.
However, the lawmakers said they were still reconciling registration records, account mandates, beneficial ownership information and transaction histories.
The committee cautioned that it had not concluded that every account or entity identified was unlawful.
Alleged ₦400m transaction under investigation
The lawmakers also disclosed an allegation involving approximately ₦400 million allegedly paid by a company to Adeyemi in four instalments.
According to the committee, the company claimed it was induced to make the payments after being promised a contract involving the renovation, furnishing or improvement of a residence purportedly allocated to Adeyemi in his claimed official capacity.
The panel said it was tracing the payment destinations, account holders and beneficial owners while investigating the ownership and status of the property allegedly presented as the official residence.
It stressed that criminal guilt had not been established and that all persons affected remained entitled to fair hearing and due process.
Committee warns against impersonating Presidency, National Assembly
The committee said its investigation went beyond the alleged creation of a fake agency, warning that the alleged fabrication of presidential and legislative documents represented a serious threat to the integrity of Nigeria’s constitutional institutions.
“The National Assembly cannot permit its legislative authority to be counterfeited,” the committee declared.
“The Presidency cannot be impersonated with impunity.”
It further stated: “The identity, authority and instruments of the Federal Republic of Nigeria cannot be appropriated by any private individual or organisation for personal advantage.”
The committee said its preliminary evidence identified Adeyemi as the principal person associated with the representation and operation of the purported organisation and with a wider network of related entities.
It, however, emphasised that its findings were preliminary and did not amount to a final determination of criminal guilt.
Recommendations and next steps
The committee recommended that security and anti-corruption agencies conclude their investigations and prosecute anyone against whom sufficient admissible evidence is established.
It also called for the tracing, preservation, freezing and recovery of proceeds of any established unlawful activity, subject to the law and applicable judicial processes.
The lawmakers said they would complete outstanding aspects of the investigation before submitting their final report to the House of Representatives.
The final report is expected to identify individual and institutional responsibilities and recommend possible legislative, administrative, disciplinary, civil, financial and criminal action.
On the allegation that Gbajabiamila authorised or participated in the purported PFIPC, however, the committee’s preliminary position was clear: it found no evidence establishing such involvement and instead documented actions by the Chief of Staff aimed at triggering investigations into the purported organisation.
Source: House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee on PFIPC Investigation
