The Nigeria Police Force has clarified that Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Olatunji Disu is not against citizens recording police officers while they carry out their duties in public.
The Force New Media Officer, Aliyu Giwa, explained that the IGP’s concern was specifically about the misuse of recordings, particularly when interactions between police officers and members of the public are deliberately turned into social media content.
Giwa made the clarification in a series of posts on X on Saturday, following criticism of Disu’s recent comments concerning Nigerians filming police officers.
He said the police were not attempting to prevent legitimate scrutiny or deny citizens their rights, stressing that the concern was with situations where officers were provoked, ridiculed or filmed for entertainment while performing their duties.
“The IGP’s concern is not to shield Police officers from accountability or deny citizens their rights. Instead, it focuses on the misuse of recordings, especially when officers are provoked, ridiculed, filmed for entertainment, or subjected to unnecessary intrusion while performing their duties,” Giwa said.
He urged Nigerians to differentiate between responsibly documenting police activities and deliberately using encounters with officers as social media content.
“It is important to distinguish between responsible documentation and the deliberate exploitation of Police encounters for social media content,” he said.
According to Giwa, legitimate recordings can provide evidence when officers engage in misconduct and can equally help protect police officers against false allegations.
“As a public institution, the Police must remain open to legitimate scrutiny. Evidence is essential when an officer acts improperly. Similarly, responsible recording can protect officers from false allegations and support investigations,” he said.
Giwa, however, stressed that being a police officer does not take away an individual’s basic rights to dignity and privacy.
“However, wearing the uniform does not remove an officer’s right to dignity or privacy,” Giwa said.
The clarification came after an X user criticised the police position, arguing that officers should instead be equipped with body cameras if the Force had concerns about citizens recording them.
In response, Giwa maintained that Disu had not rejected the recording of police officers altogether.
“While you are allowed to interpret it as you see fit, the message from the IGP was concerning the misuse of recordings, not a general rejection of legitimate documentation or accountability,” Giwa said.
He also disclosed that body cameras were being considered as part of efforts to promote accountable policing.
“Body cameras are, in fact, part of the broader conversation about modern, accountable policing, and they can protect both citizens and officers,” he said.
Giwa called for a more constructive discussion on the matter, saying citizens’ rights and police accountability could coexist with professional policing.
“The police need to be accountable and citizens should exercise their rights in a responsible way, we can have that discussion without using insults. The end aim is the same, a more professional Police Force and a safer Nigeria,” he said.
He also rejected attempts to portray the disagreement as a confrontation between the police and the public or between Disu and the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).
“Therefore, the conversation should not be framed as Police versus the public or the IGP versus the NBA,” he said.
“Instead, it should focus on balancing accountability with responsibility, transparency with privacy, and citizens’ rights with the professional discharge of Police duties,” he added.
The clarification followed a recent courtesy visit by NBA leadership to Disu at the Force Headquarters in Abuja, where the issue of recording police officers was discussed.
Disu had expressed concern about Nigerians recording police officers, particularly for social media skits, describing the practice as “very, very demoralising” for members of the Force.
The IGP, however, acknowledged that citizens have the right to record officers performing their duties in public.
“We are not saying they cannot exercise their rights of recording officers in the public places while doing their jobs,” Disu said.
“But they should put restraints and not turn our police officers to content for their skits or anything,” he added.
His remarks triggered criticism from lawyers, human rights groups and other Nigerians, with some arguing that citizens have a constitutional right to document police officers while they perform their duties in public.
NBA President Oyinkansola Badejo-Okusanya had also argued that a distinction should be made between legitimate recording of police activities and intrusion into officers’ private lives.
The controversy came after a March 17 judgment of the Federal High Court in Warri, Delta State, which affirmed Nigerians’ right to record police officers while they perform their duties in public.
Giwa said the meeting between the IGP and NBA leadership demonstrated that institutions could hold different positions while still engaging constructively.
“The engagement between the IGP and NBA leadership demonstrates that strong institutions can engage constructively, clarify positions, and collaborate despite differing perspectives,” he said.
He said the way forward was not for the police or members of the public to fear the use of cameras but to ensure that technology was deployed responsibly.
“In the digital age, the solution is not to fear the camera. Instead, we should use technology responsibly, uphold professionalism, and let truth, rather than social media narratives, define the conversation,” Giwa said.
“The camera should not weaken the institution. Also, institutions should not fear legitimate scrutiny. Both must ultimately serve the truth, justice, and the Nigerian people,” he added.
Source: X / Nigeria Police Force
